Letter of the Apostles
The Epistula Apostolorum, or Letter of the Apostles, is a fascinating early Christian work presenting a post-resurrection dialogue between Jesus and the eleven remaining apostles.
The Epistula Apostolorum, or Letter of the Apostles, is a fascinating early Christian work presenting a post-resurrection dialogue between Jesus and the eleven remaining apostles. Framed as a circular letter from the apostles to the universal church, its primary purpose is to combat emerging Gnostic teachings and affirm what the author considered orthodox doctrine. The text is structured as a series of questions posed by the apostles and answered by the risen Christ over a period of 150 days before his final ascension. Jesus addresses key theological controversies of the second century, including the nature of his incarnation, the reality of his physical suffering and resurrection, the future coming of Paul, and the final judgment. By placing these teachings directly in the mouth of the risen Lord and attributing them to the original apostles, the author sought to establish an unassailable line of authority against rival Gnostic interpretations of Christianity. It serves as a vital window into the theological battles that shaped early Christian identity.
The Epistula Apostolorum begins with an encyclical introduction, identifying the authors as the eleven apostles writing to the churches of the East, West, North, and South. The main body of the work unfolds as an extended revelation dialogue. The apostles, gathered on the Mount of Olives, ask Jesus a series of pressing questions. In response, Jesus offers detailed teachings to correct false beliefs. He explicitly condemns the Gnostic teachers Simon Magus and Cerinthus, warning that they teach a different Christ and deny the physical resurrection. Jesus affirms his own bodily resurrection by showing his wounds and explaining that he rose in the very flesh that suffered. He reinterprets the parable of the wise and foolish virgins, provides prophecies about the apostles' future missions and martyrdoms, and foretells the coming of Paul as a converted persecutor. The narrative includes an expanded account of the women at the tomb, emphasizing their role as the first witnesses to the resurrection. The dialogue covers eschatology, the creation of humanity, the descent into hell, and the signs of the end times. The work concludes with a dramatic scene of Jesus's final ascension into heaven on a cloud, leaving the apostles to begin their worldwide mission armed with his definitive teachings.
The Epistula Apostolorum was composed during a critical period of Christian self-definition in the mid-second century. At this time, Christianity was not a monolithic entity but a diverse collection of communities with competing theologies. The primary challenge addressed by the Epistula is the rise of Gnosticism, a broad movement that often taught that the material world was evil, the God of the Old Testament was an inferior creator, and salvation came through secret knowledge (gnosis) rather than faith in a physically resurrected savior. The Epistula is a piece of anti-heretical literature, likely originating from a proto-orthodox community in either Egypt or Asia Minor. It draws heavily upon the canonical Gospels of Matthew, Luke, and John, as well as oral traditions and possibly other non-canonical texts like the Gospel of Peter and the Apocalypse of Peter. By synthesizing these sources into a dialogue with Jesus, the author creates a powerful polemical tool. The text aims to solidify a specific theological viewpoint, emphasizing apostolic succession and the physical reality of Christ's life and resurrection as the bedrock of true faith against what it portrays as dangerous and deceptive spiritualizing alternatives.
The Epistula Apostolorum was never a serious contender for inclusion in the New Testament canon of any major Christian tradition. Its exclusion was due to several factors. First, its date of composition in the mid-second century was too late for a work claiming direct apostolic authorship. The early church fathers and canon-makers prioritized texts believed to originate from the apostolic era itself. Second, its pseudepigraphical nature was evident; it was clearly not written by the eleven apostles but by a later author using their names to claim authority. Third, its circulation appears to have been quite limited, primarily to certain circles in Egypt and Ethiopia. It was not widely known, quoted, or used in the major Christian centers of Rome, Antioch, or Alexandria, unlike the canonical books. While its theology is largely 'orthodox' and anti-Gnostic, it was ultimately a local work that was superseded by the four canonical Gospels and the letters of Paul, which had achieved much broader and earlier acceptance across the Christian world. The text fell into obscurity in the West and was only rediscovered by modern scholars in the late 19th century.
The text's primary motivation is to refute Gnostic teachings. It explicitly names and condemns teachers like Cerinthus and Simon Magus for denying the incarnation and physical resurrection.
Against docetic or spiritualizing views, the Epistula strongly emphasizes that Jesus was resurrected in the same physical body that was crucified. Jesus shows his wounds to the apostles as proof of his bodily reality.
The work is framed as a direct revelation from Jesus to the eleven apostles, establishing them as the sole legitimate transmitters of Christian truth. This bolsters the authority of the apostolic tradition against rival teachers.
The text uses the popular literary form of a dialogue between the risen Jesus and his disciples. This genre allowed the author to address contemporary theological questions by placing authoritative answers in Jesus's mouth.
Jesus foretells the future, including the conversion and mission of Paul, the martyrdoms of the apostles, and the signs of the end times. This presents the entire history of the church as part of a divine, pre-ordained plan.
"Beware for yourselves, for there will be some who will want to corrupt the word of my gospel... Such are the opponents of our God, and such will be those who corrupt the word of my gospel. But preach and teach this that I have commanded you... For Cerinthus and Simon will come to naught."
Significance: This passage explicitly names the author's opponents, Cerinthus and Simon Magus, identifying the text's clear anti-Gnostic purpose. It frames the struggle as a defense of the true gospel against heretical corruption.
"And I said to them, 'Why are you still in doubt and not yet believing? Am I not he who spoke to you of my flesh, my death, and my resurrection? So that you may know that it is I, lay your finger, Peter, in the nail prints of my hands; and you, Thomas, lay your finger in the spear-wound of my side; but you, Andrew, look at my feet and see if they do not touch the ground. For it is written in the prophet, A ghost of a demon makes no footprint on the earth.'"
Significance: This passage is a powerful affirmation of the physical resurrection, combining elements from Luke and John. By having Jesus invite three apostles to touch his wounds and even check for footprints, the author forcefully refutes any docetic or spiritualized view of the resurrection body.
"But one of them will be zealous in his witness concerning me. For a man will be converted from being a persecutor, his name is Paul. He will preach and teach, and all of you will be with him... He will teach and preach, and there will be many who will hear him and will be converted."
Significance: This ex post facto prophecy legitimizes the apostle Paul, who was not one of the original twelve. By placing the prediction in Jesus's mouth, the author integrates Paul and his ministry into the divine plan, validating his teachings for the author's community.
When reading the Epistula Apostolorum, approach it as a theological argument disguised as a historical narrative. Pay close attention to the questions the apostles ask Jesus; these questions reveal the specific controversies and anxieties of the author's second-century community. Notice how the author uses and adapts stories from the canonical Gospels, such as the appearances to the women and Thomas, to make a new point. The text's primary goal is to counter Gnosticism, so look for statements that emphasize the goodness of creation, the reality of Jesus's human flesh, and the physical nature of the resurrection. Comparing its portrayal of Jesus's teachings with those in Gnostic texts like the Gospel of Thomas or the Apocryphon of John can illuminate the starkly different versions of Christianity competing at the time.
The Epistula Apostolorum had a very limited direct influence on the development of mainstream Christian theology due to its restricted circulation and eventual disappearance in the West. It was not quoted by major church fathers like Irenaeus, Tertullian, or Origen, and thus did not enter the main currents of doctrinal debate. Its legacy is primarily for modern scholarship. The rediscovery of Coptic and Ethiopic manuscripts in the late 19th and early 20th centuries provided a crucial primary source for understanding the dynamics of second-century Christianity. It stands as a prime example of the 'revelation dialogue' genre and demonstrates how proto-orthodox Christians constructed arguments against their Gnostic opponents. For historians, it is an invaluable witness to the process of doctrinal formation, the defense of apostolic authority, and the creative use of gospel traditions to address new theological challenges long before the formal creeds of the ecumenical councils were established.
Discovery: The text was unknown to modern scholarship until 1895, when a partial Coptic manuscript was discovered in Akhmim, Egypt. A more complete Ethiopic version was subsequently identified among manuscripts already in Europe. A small Latin palimpsest fragment from the 5th century was found in Vienna in 1908.
Languages: The original language was almost certainly Greek, but no Greek manuscript survives. The text is extant in complete or partial translations into Coptic (Sahidic dialect), Ethiopic (Ge'ez), and a tiny fragment in Latin.
Versions: The Ethiopic version, based on a 12th-century manuscript, is the most complete, containing the entire text. The Coptic manuscript (5th century) is substantial but lacks approximately one-fifth of the work, including the beginning. The Latin fragment contains only a few verses from chapters 11-12.
Dating Notes: This dating is based on the text's clear literary dependence on the canonical Gospels, especially the Gospel of John, and its explicit polemic against Gnostic teachers like Cerinthus. Its theological concerns and literary form fit squarely within the mid-second century, a period of intense debate between proto-orthodox and Gnostic Christian groups. The absence of any mention by Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 180 CE) suggests it was written before his major works or had a very limited circulation.
50+ texts with detailed analysis and historical context.
Read FREE on Kindle Unlimited →